WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
37%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Stranded 9:09 Thu Sep 15
Noisy neighbours
Just saw this on kumb. Any chance a mod could do the honours with the picture? Cheers.

https://www.change.org/p/mayor-of-london-stop-the-plan-to-build-4-concrete-asphalt-factories-next-to-olympic-park?recruiter=12428847&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=autopublish&utm_term=des-lg-no_src-no_msg

Stop the plan to build 4 concrete & asphalt factories next to Olympic Park



Last year a planning application was submitted for the creation of London's largest concrete and asphalt factory - right at the centre of the Olympic Park, and in the middle of a dense residential area.

This development would have a dramatic impact on the local area and residents, creating 3 concrete batching plants and an Asphalt production plant adjacent to a heavily used green space.

The proposed plants, which will be next door to London Athletics and the new UCL East campus, are to run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with an estimated 900 heavy vehicles coming and going daily.

This will create an industrial blight on the area by introducing significant air, dust and noise pollution to what is otherwise a fast regenerating part of the city.

The planning applications have been submitted as four (4) wholly independent operations, without consideration given to their cumulative effects on an area now defined by new residential communities, pedestrian and cycling routes, recreational zones and athletics venues. There is a serious risk that hazardous chemical dust from concrete and asphalt manufacturing activities and associated vehicle fumes will raise air pollution to dangerous levels, resulting in asthma and other respiratory issues for the populations of Newham, Hackney and Tower Hamlets.

The full applications can be found on LLDC's planning website at http://planningregister.londonlegacy.co.uk/swift/apas/run/wphappcriteria.display : PA Refs: 15/00368/FUL / 15/00400/FUL / 15/00414/FUL / 16/00194/SCRES].

The proposal is scheduled for review before the London Legacy Development Corporation's (LLDC) planning committee as early as September 27th 2016. The LLDC was given special powers and a remit directly from the Mayor’s office to manage the Olympic Park area regeneration beyond 2012.

The LLDC is not directly accountable to local residents in the same way that the councils of Newham, Tower Hamlets or Hackney are. Consequently, the decision making of the LLDC will not always be in the interests of local residents. And it is the LLDC alone that has the final decision on whether this concrete batching development goes ahead.

The proposal of the concrete works is completely incompatible with the Mayor's office 'Clean Air for London Policy' or the current direction of residential and other developments planned for the area.

n order to protect the integrity and future development of the community, it is of paramount importance that a concerted effort be made by local residents and businesses to oppose this planning proposal NOW.

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

mentor 2:20 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
stewie griffin 10:30 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Any number of positive outcomes here

And what would they be?

Northern Sold 2:19 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
My FIRM is still to build it's new offices there... 5000+ gonna be hitting the area... hopefully just off the station and nowhere near the fucking cesspit stadium...

Northern Sold 2:18 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
My MATE had an noisy neighbour... when her and her other half were at it they literally did wake up the whole neighbourhood... thought he had a pack of wolves in there at one stage... obviously a lack of pillows to stuff in her gob

geoffpikey 2:13 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
AGGREGATE win at the OS. That'd be a first.

Mike Oxsaw 2:04 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Given that our core support - indeed our very existence - comes from being plumb bang in the centre of probably the biggest working (class) industrial area (at least, in the south east), I am over the moon at this proposal to restore a huge part of the culture that made us what we are so close to where we now find ourselves.

Fuck off, Yuppies & Hipsters.

Dwight Van Mann 1:50 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
my firm will do very well out of this.

Scraper 1:24 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
ADAM STORK

Buster 12:43 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
stewie griffin 9:12 Thu Sep 15

bruuuno 12:30 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Poor yuppies their flats will now only appreciate be £30k a year now

Stranded 12:26 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Seems there's a chance of it going ahead?

Oh, and.... "Olympicopolis" ?!?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/aug/11/olympic-park-london-plan-cement-concrete-plants-causes-uproar

Publicity for the Queen Elizabeth Olympic park described the takeover by LLDC as a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ... to develop a dynamic new heart for east London”.

However, the LLDC points out that the site, to the south-west of the park, which is close to the Olympic stadium and Pudding Mill Lane DLR station, was always zoned industrial. It is owned by Network Rail and leased to logistics company DB Schenker as an operational rail freight facility.

The LLDC said post-Olympics transformation planning consent specifically required the area to be returned to its use as an operational rail freight facility. “Only development supporting the rail related and small-scale ancillary uses will be supported,” it said.

The corporation pointed out that the use of the area as a warm-up zone for athletes during the 2012 Olympics was only temporary. “The site is safeguarded as strategic industrial land as it is a rail head and that is what it had to return to after its Games-time role had been completed,” a spokesman said.

Several local residents who have submitted written objections acknowledge that the site was historically zoned for industry, but question whether this is appropriate given the number of people who now live in the regenerated area.

“I honestly can’t think of a worse place for a heavy industrial site than the Olympic park. Callous, short-term profiteering, with no regard for the families and people who live nearby having to breath this air, and live next to a blight upon Britain’s international legacy,” Jon Linnell from Leicester wrote on the petition.

Raising an objection, local resident Adam Stork wrote to the LLDC, saying: “Although the site historically has been zoned for industrial use, the majority of local land has now been re-zoned for residential and commercial developments.

“To allow high-level industrial activity nearby will reduce the quality of life for all around it.”

Vivienne Bellamy, in a written submission to the LLDC, said: “This would not be allowed to happen in South Kensington, against which Olympicopolis is already measuring itself.”

In a written submission, Tower Hamlets council said it had broadly accepted the principle of the land use, but said the predicted HGV traffic was “undoubtedly very high” and would have a significant impact on the environment.

In the worst-case scenario, with the plants operating 24 hours a day, the council said there would be “935 HGV movements” in and out of the site daily.

The architect Mark Brearley, a professor of cities at the Cass and previously a design adviser to the former London mayor Boris Johnson, has said he supports the plans. If anyone is at fault, he said, it is the mayor’s office for not coming up with a proper plan for mixed development on the Olympic park.

“On the face of it, it is a good idea to reintroduce these uses for these sites. It it a rail serviced site, has potential water transport [via the river Lea]. There is an environmental challenge, for sure, but if we expel all industry, it defaults to a suburb on steroids with an economy that is only about sports, high-end services and education,” he said.

The LLDC, he said, was to blame for the number of new residents, which was a result of “allowing so many residential developments”.

Brearley said much industry had been taken out of the area, and London had to get its cement and concrete from somewhere. “I think one of the biggest failures is the institution of the mayor, who was in charge of it, is that they failed to come up with a plan,” he said.

A spokesman for the London mayor, Sadiq Kahn, said he had no powers to get involved in decision making.

The plans will be discussed at an LLDC meeting in September, which will be open to the public, and representations can by made to the corporation via the planning website or by email.

charleyfarley 10:38 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Concrete factory maybe they could knock us up a quick stadium

Takashi Miike 10:38 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
free gas mask/breathing device with every season ticket

stewie griffin 10:30 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Any number of positive outcomes here

Stranded 10:29 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Might get the stadium sorted on the cheap? Bung the night watchman a few quid to look the other way.

Takashi Miike 10:24 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Polluted Athletics Bowl

Stranded 10:22 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
Cheers!

Bungo 9:17 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
How much will their burgers be?

stewie griffin 9:12 Thu Sep 15
Re: Noisy neighbours
ROFL





Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: